We run IT4IT in Saudi entities as the operating layer that completes EA rather than competing with it. IT4IT answers how the IT function is run; NORA answers what gets built inside it.
IT4IT is a reference framework from The Open Group, first published in 2015, built on a simple idea: managing the IT function itself deserves to be treated as a measurable value chain, not as a grey box you keep funding without knowing what comes out. It meets TOGAF naturally because both are from the same body, and it meets ITIL because it builds on its concepts. Across Saudi Arabia, adoption is still limited, but interest is moving among large entities that have decided to stop asking "how do we fix this incident" and start asking "how do we build an IT function run by measurable capabilities".
We assess the IT function across the four value streams (S2P, R2D, R2F, D2C) in numbers, not impressions.
We list missing or weak capabilities in each stream and order them by impact.
An operating model that respects the entity's actual size, not a textbook copy, and no tool-purchase demands just because the reference mentioned them.
Sequenced cycles, starting with the highest-impact value stream, not the easiest one. Nobody who tried to do everything at once has succeeded.
Capabilities wired to the six NORA domains in one repository, with KPIs per stream and a regular review cycle inside the Governance Committee.
Value clarity instead of budget guessing. Every riyal of IT spend lines up with a value stream and an outcome you can measure, so the CFO conversation shifts from "how much did we spend" to "what did the beneficiary actually get".
Aligned governance across the silos. Project management, service management, and EA finally speak the same language instead of three dialects that argue in every meeting.
Faster delivery with less friction. Drag drops between dev, operations, and support; cycles shorten — without buying new tools.
A reference framework from The Open Group for managing the IT value chain, first released in 2015. It answers a real question: what should the IT function actually do to deliver value, not just to keep the lights on? It splits the answer into four value streams, and it complements TOGAF and ITIL rather than replacing them.
ITIL is a service-management framework focused on day-to-day operations and processes. IT4IT is broader, focused on the capabilities you need to manage the whole IT value chain from strategy through operations. The two complement each other; do not pick one over the other unless internal procurement politics force you to.
Strategy to Portfolio (S2P), Requirement to Deploy (R2D), Request to Fulfill (R2F), and Detect to Correct (D2C). Every technology service moves through these four stages whether you draw it or not. The value of IT4IT is that it draws it for you.
Honestly, no. Adoption is well below TOGAF and ITIL, and maturity is still limited. But interest is moving among large entities that are tired of asking "how much did we spend" and want to start asking "what did the beneficiary actually get".
NORA answers "what does the entity build". IT4IT answers "how does the entity run the IT function that operates what was built". Both together close the loop, so you do not end up with a brilliant architecture and chaotic operations.
Yes. We assess the current IT operating model, design the four capabilities, wire them into the service-management tools you already have, and stay with the rollout so the project does not die a quiet death after handover.
A first engagement to assess current state and design the roadmap takes 8 to 16 weeks. Capability rollout then runs incrementally, one value stream at a time. Trying to do everything in one go is a mistake; in our experience nobody who tried it succeeded.
A short session that scores the IT function across the four value streams and ships a roadmap ordered by impact — no academic recommendations.
Back to all services
